eTFDS 4-2017 net - Side 37



16.Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, et al. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q 2011;89(2):167-205.
17.Bredgaard T. Evaluering af offentlig politik og administration. København: Hans Reitzel; 2016.
18.Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes:
Oxford University Press; 2015.
19.Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex Interventions in Health: An Overview of Research Methods: Taylor & Francis;
2015.
20.Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21(10):876-884.
21.Pannick S, Sevdalis N, Athanasiou T. Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement
interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(9):716-725.
22.Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation science : IS
2015;10(1):53.
23.Rapport F, Clay-Williams R, Churruca K, et al. The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science. J Eval Clin Pract 2017.
24.Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method
to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23(4):290-298.
25.Ogrinc G, Shojania KG. Building knowledge, asking questions. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23(4):265-267.
26. Reed JE, Card AJ. The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(3):147-152.
27.Leis JA, Shojania KG. A primer on PDSA: executing plan-do-study-act cycles in practice, not just in name. BMJ
Qual Saf 2016.
28.Wilkinson J, Powell A, Davies H. Are clinicians engaged in quality improvement? A review of the literature on
healthcare professionals’ views on quality improvement initiatives. London: The Health Foundation 2011.
29.Ramsay AI, Fulop NJ. Why evaluate »common sense« quality and safety interventions? BMJ Qual Saf
2016;25(4):224-225.
S U N D H E D S V Æ S E N E T L I G E N U · TFDS 4–2017
37

Paperturn



Powered by PAPERTURN


Fuld skærm Klik for at læse
Paperturn bladre katalog system
Søg
Oversigt
Download som PDF
Fuld skærm
Afslut fuld skærm
Luk
Luk
Paperturn
Emailen er nu afsendt.
Dette felt skal udfyldes
Indtast venligst en gyldig e-mail-adresse
Dette felt skal udfyldes
Indtast venligst en gyldig e-mail-adresse
Paperturn Sender. Vent venligst...
Paperturn
Luk