eTFDS 4-2017 net - Side 37



16.Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, et al. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q 2011;89(2):167-205.
17.Bredgaard T. Evaluering af offentlig politik og administration. København: Hans Reitzel; 2016.
18.Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes:
Oxford University Press; 2015.
19.Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex Interventions in Health: An Overview of Research Methods: Taylor & Francis;
2015.
20.Dixon-Woods M, McNicol S, Martin G. Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation’s programme evaluations and relevant literature. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21(10):876-884.
21.Pannick S, Sevdalis N, Athanasiou T. Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement
interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(9):716-725.
22.Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation science : IS
2015;10(1):53.
23.Rapport F, Clay-Williams R, Churruca K, et al. The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science. J Eval Clin Pract 2017.
24.Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method
to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23(4):290-298.
25.Ogrinc G, Shojania KG. Building knowledge, asking questions. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23(4):265-267.
26. Reed JE, Card AJ. The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(3):147-152.
27.Leis JA, Shojania KG. A primer on PDSA: executing plan-do-study-act cycles in practice, not just in name. BMJ
Qual Saf 2016.
28.Wilkinson J, Powell A, Davies H. Are clinicians engaged in quality improvement? A review of the literature on
healthcare professionals’ views on quality improvement initiatives. London: The Health Foundation 2011.
29.Ramsay AI, Fulop NJ. Why evaluate »common sense« quality and safety interventions? BMJ Qual Saf
2016;25(4):224-225.
S U N D H E D S V Æ S E N E T L I G E N U · TFDS 4–2017
37

Paperturn



Powered by


Fuld skærm Klik for at læse
Paperturn bladre katalog system
Søg
Oversigt
Download som PDF
Udskriv
Indkøbskurv
Fuld skærm
Afslut fuld skærm