eTFDS 6-2015 net - Journal - Page 41
• Riiskjær, E. et al. 2014. Hvordan kan patientrapporterede oplysninger (PRO) påvirke klinisk praksis? – belyst med
udgangspunkt i fire forskellige konsultationsmodeller. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning. Nr. 3.
• Riiskjær, E. Patienten som partner. En nødvendig ide med ringe plads. Syddansk Universitetsforlag. 2014.
• Rosenbloom, S.K. et al. (2007). Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice. Psycho-Oncology 16, 1069-79.
• Roter, D. (2000). The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. Patient Education and
Counseling 39, 5-15.
• Salek, S. et al. (2007). The practical reality of using a patient-reported outcome measure in routine dermatology
clinic. Dermatology 215, 315-9.
• Scott, A. et al.(2011). The effect of finansial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 9.
• Scott, R.W. (2004). Competing logics in health care: Professional, State, and managerial. In The Sociology of the
Economy, ed F. Dobbin, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 267-87.
• Scott, W.R. (2008). Institutions and organizations Ideas and Interests. Los Angeles:Sage Publications.
• Snyder, C.F. et al.(2009). PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment.
Quality of Life Research 18, 793-800.
• Strand, V. et al. (2004). Patient-reported outcomes better discriminate active treatment from placebo in randomized
controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 43, 640-7.
• Valderas, J.M. et al. (2008). The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research 17, 179-93.
• Van der Wees, P. et al.(2014) Integrating the Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Both Clinical Practice and Performance Measurement: Views of Experts from 3 Countries. The Milbank Quarterly 92,4: 754-775.
• Werner, R.M. & Asch, D.A. (2005). The Unintended Consequences of Publicly Reporting Quality Information.
Journal of American Medical Association 293, 1239-44.
• Williams, B. et al. (1998). The Meaning of Patient Satisfaction: An Explanation Of High Reported Levels.
Social Science and Medicine 47, 1351-59.
• Willke, R.J. et al. (2004). Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy
endpoints in approved product labels. Controlled Clinical Trials 25, 535-52.
• Winters, Z.E. et al. (2010). A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life.
Annals of Surgery 252, 929-42.
T E M A · TFDS 6–2015
41
