NRS 880 Supreme Court Papers and Depositions, Supreme Court Sydney and on Circuit [9/7196] R V Kate Leigh, Perjury [AF00301605] - Flipbook - Page 10
Vk
assault & these people had gone to see the man who done the
assault,
I don't know Murphy at all. I never saw Sichel keep—
To Ur Bevan:
,
ing company with any boy. I never spoke to ally one about the
assault except to the people I saw on the Saturd4y, They were
strangers to me. They said they thought Murphy would be all
right,they were getting the man awa that would be Bronco
George. The next I heard was when Sichelis mother came
I told her I would have nothing to do with it.
would not be
brou,/lat into the atter, Sichel was well known to mel not a
great friend of mine More of a neighbor than a rend. His
mother was a friend of mine, I never heard nothing about
Slchel till he had been tried and convicted His mother came
to me and
got a letter from Sichel whilst in aol. When
the first appeal came off his mother came to me, I know
man named .744,eergehan. He it a convicted thief, He does not
frequent Ay ouse I know a man named Oswald Waerhouse,
don't know agything about his dealing in oium, I knew a
Lan named Sampson. His people were living opposite to me.
have been before the Court for minor offences. Me and Ay
husband were committed three times but get out
Over
nine years age I was fineC., I could not say what for, I have
not been fined snce
have carried on the restaurant for
five years.
Taken before me this
IIth day of April 1913 )
Kate Leigh*
Arthur G. Saddington
Deputy Prothonotary.