NRS 880 Supreme Court Papers and Depositions, Supreme Court Sydney and on Circuit [9/7196] R V Kate Leigh, Perjury [AF00301605] - Flipbook - Page 35
am a
,
au.
W V
THAT she the said. Kate Le did not at any time tell
Detective William Robert-on and Constable Thomas William
Hooper that she did not now the said Samuel Freeman
•
a -Arica_ As:1111111111M1.1153E
esaid say to the sa
Wi
William Robertson
lam Hooper,I (meani t the said K
d Th ma s
Lee) see Je y
1112
in the said Samue
Preen -
the
ensation at Strath
„id TEAT at the Central Polio
the bloke that cau
Stati. 1 aCoresaid 0
1
salct
THAT the
aid *441.34.04-me William Robertson
did not takkhe said Ka e Lee
tholice station cell
in which the said Samuel teeman was then detained and
Ce)
'At;
the said Samuel Free
aid. SaMIV5
K.te
tht
a • •
1$
Le a se r
C • stable
William ,•bertson px.c1
fi
nest
d
a
V a,
•
1
d AND the said
W
Robert Jardine Brovning cha ges that what the said. Kate
Lee then so 'swore was on an occasion when the truth off the
same was 'material AND that
I
he said Kate Lee did not on the
night of the fifth day of J
see the said Samuel Freeman
at the said Skating Rink and that the said Samuel Freeman
did not accompany her on the said night to her house in
Cascade Street aforesaid AND that the said. Samuel Freeiaan
did not remain continuously i the said house from the night
of the fifth day of June afor said until six oclock in the
afternoon in the said sixth C of June Aller—nrat-411eveforn
&
„.;
A •
•
a
if
e morni if_
v
v IP
aid
a a
1.73
AND
that the said Kate Lee did tell the said William Robertson
and. Thomas William Hooper that she did not know the said
• 7,
,