Colnaghi Foundation Journal 03 - Page 25
23
For Jennifer Fletcher
Too many cooks…; Cerezo, Barranco, De Leito,
and the kitchen still life in Madrid
PETER C H ER RY
Fig. 1 / Attributed to
Mateo Cerezo, Still Life
with Lamb, Bread, and
Kitchen Utensils, oil on
canvas, 100 x 127 cm,
Madrid, Museo Nacional
del Prado.
Since its acquisition by the Museo Nacional del Prado
in 1970, Still Life with Lamb, Bread, and Kitchen Utensils
(P3159) has been one of the most widely exhibited
– and admired – Spanish still-life paintings from the
seventeenth century (fig. 1). It entered the museum
as an anonymous painting of the Madrid school.1 Its
quality was noted in 1972, when it was catalogued as
“Obra excelente de estilo próximo a Pereda.” 2 In the
catalogue of the London exhibition The Golden Age of
Spanish Painting in 1976, Xavier de Salas was unable
to decide on its authorship; he said that it might be
by Antonio de Pereda and painted ca. 1640, but also
noted its compositional similarities to signed still lifes by
Mateo Cerezo in the Museo de San Carlos in Mexico
City (figs. 2 & 3). Alfonso Pérez Sánchez went on to
develop the attribution to Cerezo on stylistic grounds
in the catalogue of his exhibition D. Antonio de Pereda
(1611-1678) y la Pintura Madrileña de su Tiempo.3 This
was also based on perceived stylistic similarities with the
Cerezo still lifes in Mexico; he said that the treatment of
the meat and the copper utensils is almost identical in
these paintings, as is the pictorial contrast between the
bread and white cloth. He noted that the style of the
feathers in the Prado picture is similar to birds painted
by Frans Snyders (1579 -1657) or Jan Fyt (1611-1661),
something which, in his view, would not be surprising
in a work painted in Madrid ca. 1660. Pérez Sánchez
exhibited the painting again in Pintura Española de
Bodegones y Floreros de 1600 a Goya in 1983-1984, which
also included the two still lifes by Cerezo from Mexico;
the catalogue entry repeated the assertions made in
1978.4 By this time, he claimed that the attribution to
Cerezo was generally accepted.
The painting was given to Cerezo in subsequent
publications by Pérez Sánchez and routinely compared
to this artist’s still lifes in Mexico. It was listed as such in
the catalogue of the paintings of the Museo del Prado
in 1985 by Pérez Sánchez, then the museum’s director.5
He included it in his exhibition Carreño, Rizi, Herrera y
la Pintura Madrileña de su Tiempo [1650-1700] in 1986,
in which he elaborated his catalogue entry of 1978.6
His book La nature morte espagnole of 1987 repeated the
same information.7 The picture is in the catalogue
raisonné of the artist by Rogelio Buendía and Ismael
Gutiérrez Pastor, Vida y obra del pintor Mateo Cerezo (16371666) of 1986.8 These authors followed Pérez Sánchez
in stressing the similarity of the painting with the
signed still lifes in Mexico, while also emphasizing the
influence of the compositions of Giuseppe Recco and
Flemish still-life painting.
Doubts about the attribution to Cerezo began to
appear with the first international showing of Still Life
with Lamb, Bread, and Kitchen Utensils in 1976 in the
exhibition The Golden Age of Spanish Painting at the Royal
Academy, London.9 The picture was highlighted in the
review by Eric Young, “New Perspectives on Spanish
Still-Life Painting in the Golden Age,” in which the
author claimed not to be persuaded by the attributions
to either Pereda or Cerezo.10 It was included in Spanish
Still Life from Velázquez to Goya at the National Gallery,
London, in 1995, in whose catalogue the organizers,
William Jordan and the present author, noted
differences, rather than similarities, in the style and
handling of the picture in comparison with Cerezo’s
still lifes in Mexico.11
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157
- Page 158
- Page 159
- Page 160
- Page 161
- Page 162
- Page 163
- Page 164
- Page 165
- Page 166
- Page 167
- Page 168
- Page 169
- Page 170
- Page 171
- Page 172
- Page 173
- Page 174
- Page 175
- Page 176
- Page 177
- Page 178
- Page 179
- Page 180
- Page 181
- Page 182
- Page 183
- Page 184
- Page 185
- Page 186
- Page 187
- Page 188
- Page 189
- Page 190
- Page 191
- Page 192
- Page 193
- Page 194
- Page 195
- Page 196
- Page 197
- Page 198
- Page 199
- Page 200
- Page 201
- Page 202
- Page 203
- Page 204
- Page 205
- Page 206
- Page 207
- Page 208

Powered by
